Knowing how to end and resume conversations over time is a natural part of communication, allowing for discussions to span weeks, months, or years. The duration of gaps between conversations dictates which topics are relevant and which questions to ask, and dialogue systems which do not explicitly model time may generate responses that are unnatural. In this work we explore the idea of making dialogue models aware of time, and present GapChat, a multi-session dialogue dataset in which the time between each session varies. While the dataset is constructed in real-time, progress on events in speakers{'} lives is simulated in order to create realistic dialogues occurring across a long timespan. We expose time information to the model and compare different representations of time and event progress. In human evaluation we show that time-aware models perform better in metrics that judge the relevance of the chosen topics and the information gained from the conversation.

Existing dialogue models may encounter scenarios which are not well-represented in the training data, and as a result generate responses that are unnatural, inappropriate, or unhelpful. We propose the "Ask an Expert" framework in which the model is trained with access to an "expert" which it can consult at each turn. Advice is solicited via a structured dialogue with the expert, and the model is optimized to selectively utilize (or ignore) it given the context and dialogue history. In this work the expert takes the form of an LLM.We evaluate this framework in a mental health support domain, where the structure of the expert conversation is outlined by pre-specified prompts which reflect a reasoning strategy taught to practitioners in the field. Blenderbot models utilizing "Ask an Expert" show quality improvements across all expert sizes, including those with fewer parameters than the dialogue model itself. Our best model provides a 10% improvement over baselines, approaching human-level scores on "engingingness" and "helpfulness" metrics.

We explore the idea of incorporating concepts from writing skills curricula into human-machine collaborative writing scenarios, focusing on adding writing modes as a control for text generation models. Using crowd-sourced workers, we annotate a corpus of narrative text paragraphs with writing mode labels. Classifiers trained on this data achieve an average accuracy of 87% on held-out data. We fine-tune a set of large language models to condition on writing mode labels, and show that the generated text is recognized as belonging to the specified mode with high accuracy. To study the ability of writing modes to provide fine-grained control over generated text, we devise a novel turn-based text reconstruction game to evaluate the difference between the generated text and the author's intention. We show that authors prefer text suggestions made by writing mode-controlled models on average 61.1% of the time, with satisfaction scores 0.5 higher on a 5-point ordinal scale. When evaluated by humans, stories generated via collaboration with writing mode-controlled models achieve high similarity with the professionally written target story. We conclude by identifying the most common mistakes found in the generated stories.

To develop computational agents that better communicate using their own emergent language, we endow the agents with an ability to focus their attention on particular concepts in the environment. Humans often understand an object or scene as a composite of concepts and those concepts are further mapped onto words. We implement this intuition as cross-modal attention mechanisms in Speaker and Listener agents in a referential game and show attention leads to more compositional and interpretable emergent language. We also demonstrate how attention aids in understanding the learned communication protocol by investigating the attention weights associated with each message symbol and the alignment of attention weights between Speaker and Listener agents. Overall, our results suggest that attention is a promising mechanism for developing more human-like emergent language.

We introduce the task of implicit offensive text detection in dialogues, where a statement may have either an offensive or non-offensive interpretation, depending on the listener and context. We argue that reasoning is crucial for understanding this broader class of offensive utterances and release SLIGHT, a dataset to support research on this task. Experiments using the data show that state-of-the-art methods of offense detection perform poorly when asked to detect implicitly offensive statements, achieving only ∼11% accuracy. In contrast to existing offensive text detection datasets, SLIGHT features human-annotated chains of reasoning which describe the mental process by which an offensive interpretation can be reached from each ambiguous statement. We explore the potential for a multi-hop reasoning approach by utilizing existing entailment models to score the probability of these chains and show that even naive reasoning models can yield improved performance in most situations. Furthermore, analysis of the chains provides insight into the human interpretation process and emphasizes the importance of incorporating additional commonsense knowledge.

We release Amp-Space, a large-scale dataset of paired audio samples: a source audio signal, and an output signal, the result of a timbre transformation. The types of transformations we study are from blackbox musical tools (amplifiers, stompboxes, studio effects) traditionally used to shape the sound of guitar, bass, or synthesizer sounds. For each sample of transformed audio, the set of parameters used to create it are given. Samples are from both real and simulated devices, the latter allowing for orders of magnitude greater data than found in comparable datasets. We demonstrate potential use cases of this data by (a) pre-training a conditional WaveNet model on synthetic data and show that it reduces the number of samples necessary to digitally reproduce a real musical device, and (b) training a variational autoencoder to shape a continuous space of timbre transformations for creating new sounds through interpolation.

Adapting machine translation systems in the real world is a difficult problem. In contrast to offline training, users cannot provide the type of fine-grained feedback (such as correct translations) typically used for improving the system. Moreover, different users have different translation needs, and even a single user's needs may change over time. In this work we take a different approach, treating the problem of adaptation as one of selection. Instead of adapting a single system, we train many translation systems using different architectures, datasets, and optimization methods. Using bandit learning techniques on simulated user feedback, we learn a policy to choose which system to use for a particular translation task. We show that our approach can (1) quickly adapt to address domain changes in translation tasks, (2) outperform the single best system in mixed-domain translation tasks, and (3) make effective instance-specific decisions when using contextual bandit strategies.

In multi-agent learning, agents must coordinate with each other in order to succeed. For humans, this coordination is typically accomplished through the use of language. In this work we perform a controlled study of human language use in a competitive team-based game, and search for useful lessons for structuring communication protocol between autonomous agents.
We construct Pow-Wow, a new dataset for studying situated goal-directed human communication. Using the Pommerman game environment, we enlisted teams of humans to play against teams of AI agents, recording their observations, actions, and communications. We analyze the types of communications which result in effective game strategies, annotate them accordingly, and present corpus-level statistical analysis of how trends in communications affect game outcomes. Based on this analysis, we design a communication policy for learning agents, and show that agents which utilize communication achieve higher win-rates against baseline systems than those which do not.

We propose a hierarchical meta-learning-inspired model for music source separation (Meta-TasNet) in which a generator model is used to predict the weights of individual extractor models. This enables efficient parameter-sharing, while still allowing for instrument-specific parameterization. Meta-TasNet is shown to be more effective than the models trained independently or in a multi-task setting, and achieve performance comparable with state-of-the-art methods. In comparison to the latter, our extractors contain fewer parameters and have faster run-time performance. We discuss important architectural considerations, and explore the costs and benefits of this approach.

We introduce Language World Models, a class of language-conditional generative model which interpret natural language messages by predicting latent codes of future observations. This provides a visual grounding of the message, similar to an enhanced observation of the world, which may include objects outside of the listening agent's field-of-view. We incorporate this "observation" into a persistent memory state, and allow the listening agent's policy to condition on it, akin to the relationship between memory and controller in a World Model. We show this improves effective communication and task success in 2D gridworld speaker-listener navigation tasks. In addition, we develop two losses framed specifically for our model-based formulation to promote positive signalling and positive listening. Finally, because messages are interpreted in a generative model, we can visualize the model beliefs to gain insight into how the communication channel is utilized.

Neural architectures are prominent in the construction of language models (LMs). However, word-level prediction is typically agnostic of subword-level information (characters and character sequences) and operates over a closed vocabulary, consisting of a limited word set. Indeed, while subword-aware models boost performance across a variety of NLP tasks, previous work did not evaluate the ability of these models to assist next-word prediction in language modeling tasks. Such subword-level informed models should be particularly effective for morphologically-rich languages (MRLs) that exhibit high type-to-token ratios. In this work, we present a large-scale LM study on 50 typologically diverse languages covering a wide variety of morphological systems, and offer new LM benchmarks to the community, while considering subword-level information. The main technical contribution of our work is a novel method for injecting subword-level information into semantic word vectors, integrated into the neural language modeling training, to facilitate word-level prediction. We conduct experiments in the LM setting where the number of infrequent words is large, and demonstrate strong perplexity gains across our 50 languages, especially for morphologically-rich languages. Our code and data sets are publicly available.

Statistical morphological inflectors are typically trained on fully supervised, type-level data. One remaining open research question is the following: How can we effectively exploit raw, token-level data to improve their performance? To this end, we introduce a novel generative latent-variable model for the semi-supervised learning of inflection generation. To enable posterior inference over the latent variables, we derive an efficient variational inference procedure based on the wake-sleep algorithm. We experiment on 23 languages, using the Universal Dependency corpora in a simulated low-resource setting, and find an average improvement of 10%.

We propose a hypothesis only baseline for diagnosing Natural Language Inference (NLI). Especially when an NLI dataset assumes inference is occurring based purely on the relationship between a context and a hypothesis, it follows that assessing entailment relations while ignoring the provided context is a degenerate solution. Yet, through experiments on ten distinct NLI datasets, we find that this approach, which we refer to as a hypothesis-only model, is able to significantly outperform a majority-class baseline across a number of NLI datasets. Our analysis suggests that statistical irregularities may allow a model to perform NLI in some datasets beyond what should be achievable without access to the context.

We present an empirical study of gender bias in coreference resolution systems. We first introduce a novel, Winograd schema-style set of minimal pair sentences that differ only by pronoun gender. With these Winogender schemas, we evaluate and confirm systematic gender bias in three publicly-available coreference resolution systems, and correlate this bias with real-world and textual gender statistics.

We present a study in the creative design of robots using found objects. In particular, this study focuses on learning locomotion techniques for robots with nontraditional and arbitrary shaped limbs, in this case, tree branches. Through a use of 3D scanning, simulation, and deep reinforcement learning, we show that we can effectively learn movement strategies for such robots with unorthodox shapes.

In this work we present a system to apply realistic lighting effects to 2D character illustrations. Our approach involves a cascaded set of predictions: first generating a normal map of the character’s 3D structure, utilizing it (and a light source) to predict a global shadow map, and combining both to render the final effect. This allows our system to paint natural overlapping shadows, and recreate complex lighting effects, such as rim-lighting, while maintaining the ease of use associated with CGI. Results on original illustrations show the effectiveness of our method.

This paper presents Hitachi and JHU’s efforts on developing CHiME-5 system to recognize dinner party speeches recorded by multiple microphone arrays. We newly developed (1) the way to apply multiple data augmentation methods, (2) residual bidirectional long short-term memory, (3) 4-ch acoustic models, (4) multiple-array combination methods, (5) hypothesis deduplication method, and (6) speaker adaptation technique of neural beamformer. As the results, our best system in category B achieved 52.38% of word error rates (WERs) for development set, which corresponded to 35% of relative WER reduction from the state-of-the-art baseline. Our best system also achieved 48.20% of WER for evaluation set, which was the 2nd best result in the CHiME-5 competition.

Given that in practice training data is scarce for all but a small set of problems, a core question is how to incorporate prior knowledge into a model. In this paper, we consider the case of prior procedural knowledge for neural networks, such as knowing how a program should traverse a sequence, but not what local actions should be performed at each step. To this end, we present an end-to-end differentiable interpreter for the programming language Forth which enables programmers to write program sketches with slots that can be filled with behaviour trained from program input-output data. We can optimise this behaviour directly through gradient descent techniques on user-specified objectives, and also integrate the program into any larger neural computation graph. We show empirically that our interpreter is able to effectively leverage different levels of prior program structure and learn complex behaviours such as sequence sorting and addition. When connected to outputs of an LSTM and trained jointly, our interpreter achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for end-to-end reasoning about quantities expressed in natural language stories.

With the adoption of general neural network architectures, many researchers have opted to trade informative priors for powerful models and big data. However, for many structured prediction tasks the complex relationships between variables in the output space are often difficult to learn from the available data alone.
Such relationships often centre around the notion of exclusion: that predicting one structure prohibits the prediction of others. In this work we formulate a differentiable factor graph exclusion constraint to incorporate this prior belief into neural end-to-end architectures. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method in the context of extracting event information from clusters of related news articles, and introduce metainference learning to determine the ideal number of inference iterations to simulate.

Comprehending lyrics, as found in songs and poems, can pose a challenge to human and machine readers alike. This motivates the need for systems that can understand the ambiguity and jargon found in such creative texts, and provide commentary to aid readers in reaching the correct interpretation. We introduce the task of automated lyric annotation (ALA). Like text simplification, a goal of ALA is to rephrase the original text in a more easily understandable manner. However, in ALA the system must often include additional information to clarify niche terminology and abstract concepts. To stimulate research on this task, we release a large collection of crowdsourced annotations for song lyrics. We analyze the performance of translation and retrieval models on this task, measuring performance with both automated and human evaluation. We find that each model captures a unique type of information important to the task.

Semantic parsers map natural language statements into meaning representations, and must abstract over syntactic phenomena, resolve anaphora, and identify word senses to eliminate ambiguous interpretations. Abstract meaning representation (AMR) is a recent example of one such semantic formalism which, similar to a dependency parse, utilizes a graph to represent relationships between concepts (Banarescu et al., 2013). As with dependency parsing, transition-based approaches are a common approach to this problem. However, when trained in the traditional manner these systems are susceptible to the accumulation of errors when they find undesirable states during greedy decoding. Imitation learning algorithms have been shown to help these systems recover from such errors.
To effectively use these methods for AMR parsing we find it highly beneficial to introduce two novel extensions: noise reduction and targeted exploration. The former mitigates the noise in the feature representation, a result of the complexity of the task. The latter targets the exploration steps of imitation learning towards areas which are likely to provide the most information in the context of a large action-space. We achieve state-ofthe art results, and improve upon standard transition-based parsing by 4.7 F1 points

We develop a novel transition-based parsing algorithm for the abstract meaning representation parsing task using exact imitation learning, in which the parser learns a statisticalmodel by imitating the actions of an experton the training data. We then use the imitation learning algorithm DAGGER to improvethe performance, and apply an α-bound as asimple noise reduction technique. Our performance on the test set was 60% in F-score, andthe performance gains on the development setdue to DAGGER was up to 1.1 points of F-score. The α-bound improved performance byup to 1.8 points.

A human listener, charged with the difficult task of mapping language to meaning, must infer a rich hierarchy of linguistic structures, beginning with an utterance and culminating in an understanding of what was spoken. Much in the same manner, developing complete natural language processing systems requires the processing of many different layers of linguistic information in order to solve complex tasks, like answering a query or translating a document.

Historically the community has largely adopted a “divide and conquer” strategy, choosing to split up such complex tasks into smaller fragments which can be tackled independently, with the hope that these smaller contributions will also yield benefits to NLP systems as a whole. These individual components can be laid out in a pipeline and processed in turn, one system’s output becoming input for the next. This approach poses two problems. First, errors propagate, and, much like the childhood game of “telephone”, combining systems in this manner can lead to unintelligible outcomes. Second, each component task requires annotated training data to act as supervision for training the model. These annotations are often expensive and time-consuming to produce, may differ from each other in genre and style, and may not match the intended application.

In this dissertation we pursue novel extensions of joint inference techniques for natural language processing. We present a framework that offers a general method for constructing and performing inference using graphical model formulations of typical NLP problems. Models are composed using weighted Boolean logic constraints, inference is performed using belief propagation. The systems we develop are composed of two parts: one a representation of syntax, the other a desired end task (part-of-speech tagging, semantic role labeling, named entity recognition, or relation extraction). By modeling these problems jointly, both models are trained in a single, integrated process, with uncertainty propagated between them. This mitigates the accumulation of errors typical of pipelined approaches. We further advance previous methods for performing efficient inference on graphical model representations of combinatorial structure, like dependency syntax, extending it to various forms of phrase structure parsing.

Finding appropriate training data is a crucial problem for joint inference models. We observe that in many circumstances, the output of earlier components of the pipeline is often irrelevant – only the end task output is important. Yet we often have strong a priori assumptions regarding what this structure might look like: for phrase structure syntax the model should represent a valid tree, for dependency syntax it should represent a directed graph. We propose a novel marginalization-based training method in which the error signal from end task annotations is used to guide the induction of a constrained latent syntactic representation. This allows training in the absence of syntactic training data, where the latent syntactic structure is instead optimized to best support the end task predictions. We find that across many NLP tasks this training method offers performance comparable to fully supervised training of each individual component, and in some instances im- proves upon it by learning latent structures which are more appropriate for the task.

Many NLP tasks make predictions that are inherently coupled to syntactic relations, but for many languages the resources required to provide such syntactic annotations are unavailable. For others it is unclear exactly how much of the syntactic annotations can be effectively leveraged with current models, and what structures in the syntactic trees are most relevant to the current task.

We propose a novel method which avoids the need for any syntactically annotated data when predicting a related NLP task. Our method couples latent syntactic representations, constrained to form valid dependency graphs or constituency parses, with the prediction task via specialized factors in a Markov random field. At both training and test time we marginalize over this hidden structure, learning the optimal latent representations for the problem. Results show that this approach provides significant gains over a syntactically uninformed baseline, outperforming models that observe syntax on an English relation extraction task, and performing comparably to them in semantic role labeling.

Many NLP tasks interact with syntax. The presence of a named entity span, for example, is often a clear indicator of a noun phrase in the parse tree, while a span in the syntax can help indicate the lack of a named entity in the spans that cross it. For these types of problems joint inference offers a better solution than a pipelined approach, and yet large joint models are rarely pursued. In this paper we argue this is due in part to the absence of a general framework for joint inference which can efficiently represent syntactic structure.

We propose an alternative and novel method in which constituency parse constraints are imposed on the model via combinatorial factors in a Markov random field, guaranteeing that a variable configuration forms a valid tree. We apply this approach to jointly predicting parse and named entity structure, for which we introduce a zero-order semi-CRF named entity recognizer which also relies on a combinatorial factor. At the junction between these two models, soft constraints coordinate between syntactic constituents and named entity spans, providing an additional layer of flexibility on how these models interact. With this architecture we achieve the best-reported results on both CRF-based parsing and named entity recognition on sections of the OntoNotes corpus, and outperform state-of-the-art parsers on an NP-identification task, while remaining asymptotically faster than traditional grammar-based parsers.

This paper describes an unsupervised dynamic graphical model for morphological segmentation and bilingual morpheme alignment for statistical machine translation. The model extends Hidden Semi-Markov chain models by using factored output nodes and special structures for its conditional probability distributions. It relies on morpho-syntactic and lexical source-side information (part-of-speech, morphological segmentation) while learning a morpheme segmentation over the target language. Our model outperforms a competitive word alignment system in alignment quality. Used in a monolingual morphological segmentation setting it substantially improves accuracy over previous state-of-the-art models on three Arabic and Hebrew datasets.

Most previous studies of morphological disambiguation and dependency parsing have been pursued independently. Morphological taggers operate on n-grams and do not take into account syntactic relations; parsers use the ``pipeline'' approach, assuming that morphological information has been separately obtained.

However, in morphologically-rich languages, there is often considerable interaction between morphology and syntax, such that neither can be disambiguated without the other. In this paper, we propose a discriminative model that jointly infers morphological properties and syntactic structures. In evaluations on various highly-inflected languages, this joint model outperforms both a baseline tagger in morphological disambiguation, and a pipeline parser in head selection.

Log-linear models provide a convenient method for coupling existing machine learning methods to constraint-based linguistic formalisms like optimality theory and harmonic grammar. While the learning methods themselves have been well studied in this domain, the question of how these constraints originate is often left unanswered. We present a novel, error-driven approach to constraint induction that performs lightweight decisions based on local information. When evaluated on the task of reproducing human gradient phonotactic judgements, a model trained with this procedure can sometimes nearly match the performance of state-of-the-art methods that rely on global information and individual assessment of all possible constraints. We conclude by discussing methods for incorporating context and linguistic bias into the induction scheme to produce more accurate grammars.

Topic models are a useful tool for analyzing large text collections, but have previously been applied in only monolingual, or at most bilingual, contexts. Meanwhile, massive collections of interlinked documents in dozens of languages, such as Wikipedia, are now widely available, calling for tools that can characterize content in many languages. We introduce a polylingual topic model that discovers topics aligned across multiple languages. We explore the model's characteristics using two large corpora, each with over ten different languages, and demonstrate its usefulness in supporting machine translation and tracking topic trends across languages.

Unsupervised learning of morphology is an important task for human learners and in natural language processing systems. Previous systems focus on segmenting words into substrings (taking => tak.ing), but sometimes a segmentation-only analysis is insufficient (e.g., taking may be more appropriately analyzed as take.ing, with a spelling rule accounting for the deletion of the stem-final e). In this paper, we develop a Bayesian model for simultaneously inducing both morphology and spelling rules. We show that the addition of spelling rules improves performance over the baseline morphology-only model.